powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Acquiring malcontent stars leaves everybody disgruntled Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

Acquiring malcontent stars leaves everybody disgruntled

 

There's a lesson here, for anyone looking hard enough to find it. But you'll have to look awfully hard, through all those layers of Shaquille O'Neal's fat and past Allen Iverson's selfishness. And you'll have to look with wisdom, careful not to be fooled by the two faces of Jason Kidd.

But if you can do all that, congratulations. You're smarter than the average NBA general manager, who would happily gut his team for the chance to add an NBA superstar.

This might be the closest Jason Kidd got to Chris Paul the entire series. (Getty Images)  
This might be the closest Jason Kidd got to Chris Paul the entire series. (Getty Images)  
How did that work out, Phoenix Suns?

Dallas Mavericks?

Denver Nuggets?

The three most disappointing teams in the 2008 NBA playoffs. The three teams who traded for the disgruntled superstar. See the connection? Is the lesson starting to seep in?

This postseason ought to be enough to jar NBA executives out of their favorite trade adage, which postulates thusly: In any trade, no matter how many teams and players are involved, find the biggest superstar in the deal and circle his new team. That's who won the trade.

That's the theory, but like so many theories -- Rome being invincible, Earth being flat, Bush being right -- it has crumbled under the weight of reality. Not to mention the weight of Shaquille's ass.

Here's the thing about an NBA superstar: Wherever he is, if he's miserable, he's part of the problem. Too much losing, not enough touches, not enough respect or attention or whatever ... he's not immune.

And whatever was wrong in one city, it will be wrong in the next.

There's concrete data here, people.

Allen Iverson was a loser in Philadelphia, and he's been a loser in Denver. Great player? No question. He's one of the most incredible individual talents ever. But he's a loser, the anti-Midas, and his toxic touch followed him to Denver, which disgraced itself in a first-round sweep by the Lakers. The Nuggets quit in that series, dissolving under the leadership -- such as it is -- of its selfish point guard. Iverson, Carmelo Anthony and J.R. Smith took turns going one-on-five, jacking up 214 shots while begrudgingly handing out just 33 assists in 412 combined minutes. Selfish is as selfish does, and Iverson is the most selfish superstar this league has ever seen.

Unsurprisingly, the 76ers have been better off without him. They were 5-12 (.294) when he forced the trade to Denver early last season, then went 30-35 (.462) the rest of that season and 40-42 (.488) this season. While Denver flamed out in four games in the 2008 playoffs, the 76ers are putting up a fight against Detroit.

CONTINUED: 1 · 2 · Next »
 
Talk Back
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 27, 2006

May 1, 2008 11:54 am
Doyel you are an idiot.  Picking up a superstar player is a great way to win a championship.  It doesn't work everytime only because one team can win the championship.  Lets take a look back at some recent title winners.  The Miami Heat picked up disgruntled star Shaq, what happens, they win the NBA title.  The Pistons trade for disgruntled star Rasheed Wallace, the result ...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 26, 2008

May 1, 2008 4:09 pm
It is always unclear who is a malcontent star and who isn't. Kobe Bryant was a malcontent before he realized how good Andrew Bynum had become and that the front office was willing to get a guy like Gasol. I don't think that Boston represents a great example either. I don't think the Celtics success rests solely on the big three. All of those guys are old, and have been spelled signific ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 16, 2007

May 1, 2008 3:37 pm
Kevin Garnett, Rasheed Wallace, Shaq to the Lakers early in his career (not a trade, but an upset superstar), Shaq to the Heat, Ray Allen to the Celts, Glen Rice to the Lakers, Dennis Rodman to the Bulls, Mark Aguire to the Pistons, Moses Malone to the 76ers.

 Hey Greg, is there any chance whatsoever that  coaching, and not personnel was an issue?  D'antoni 2x agains
...(more)
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 21, 2006

May 2, 2008 4:14 pm

I'm not sure how long it has been since his name and superstar have been mentioned in the same sentence, but I just read that grant hill has never made it out of the first round.  Isn't that crazy?  I remember how bad the league wanted him to be the next Jordan, and his contracts on and off the court we're crazy huge.  I mean never won a series in his career, WOW.&nbs ...(more)

Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 30, 2006

May 2, 2008 10:18 am
I get the arguments for why Kidd and Iverson are selfish, or malcontents, or team cancers, or whatever.  I don't necessarily agree with them, especially when it comes to Iverson, but I understand them.  But how in the world does Shaq fit into that mold?  The guy is one of the best ambassadors for the game that the NBA has ever had.  I can't recall a single instance (asi ...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 3, 2007

May 1, 2008 2:03 pm

Haha Ive got my clever title hat on today.  Anyway, Doyel youre completely right.  I mentioned this in my blog yesterday.  I think anytime you add a superstar midseason it is a disaster.  It ruins team chemistry and usually your teams depth and rotation, and most of the time the superstar doesn't fit into your team concept. 

Now I understand what both the Su ...(more)

Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 13, 2006

May 1, 2008 2:01 pm
The Lakers traded because they got an incredible deal -  A fabulous player for next to nothing.  Memphis was gonna lose Gasol soon and traded for hope in the future.
Boston traded for the best player in the game and got him.  Minny traded because they also knew they were going to lose him.  These other trades seemed to be desperation moves to keep up with the rest of the
...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 8, 2006

May 1, 2008 3:04 pm
Acquiring an unhappy KG and Ray Allen to replace Sebastian Telfair and Co. really backfired for those Celtics didn't it?

Adding Rashard Lewis to the Magic?

42 and 12 game improvements, respectively. The teams that game them up (Sonics, Timberwolves) both won about ten games less this year, which is more amazing when you take into account that neither one won more
...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 15, 2006

May 1, 2008 11:32 pm

I see several posts on the board spouting off, calling Doyel an idiot for his article.  However, the guy is spot on!  Let's use some common sense in evaluating his argument. 

1.  A team does not trade it's bread and butter unless there is trouble in paradise.  Either the player is leaving as a free agent, he is unhappy and bringing the rest of the squad ...(more)

Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 25, 2006

May 1, 2008 10:23 pm

The Kidd and Shaq deals were trade deadline reaches, to say the least.  Kidd can shine in an All-star game because it is what it is, a circus.  But rely on him to get you "over the hump?"  You may as well sign Gary Payton.  Mark Cuban needs to get a luxury box and stay out of the way.

Shaq got in shape one time to spite the Lakers.  However, he co ...(more)

Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Jul 18, 2007

May 1, 2008 6:06 pm

Iverson and Kidd! I wouldn't want either of them on my team, I wouldn't have wanted them 5-7 years ago. They are cancerous to any team! They have history of crying wherever they are, and any situation they are in! They never look at themselves and go maybe if I did this different my team can win! Iverson has Melo, Nene, Camby, and a great cast - can't win! Of course it's not his ...(more)

Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Jul 19, 2007

May 1, 2008 5:12 pm
That was just a little harsh. I had no idea it was like that. I had no idea Kidd was like that. I've heard so many bad things about this guy yet I've never seen any of it.  I've always thought Iverson was a very selfish player and I was kind of hesistant for my Nuggets to make that trade. I was afraid he would play his ball hogging, over dribbling style of ball and just completely kill Carmel ...(more)
Reputation:89
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 20, 2006

May 1, 2008 4:32 pm
I think you could say Boston might not make it past Atlanta! So before you call Garnett the savior lets see if it's the same old flop there!!
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 14, 2007

May 1, 2008 7:38 pm
How about Garnett going to Boston?

How about Bibby going to Atlanta?

How about Gasol going to The Lakers?

How about Lewis going to Orlando?

The point is that this story is nonsense because for every team it didn't work out for, there is a team where the trade did work.