Did they say 2 points was convicing?

Excellent point tarheelguy124, when you state the baloney in that a 2 point victory is convincing . . . NOT!

I'll go so far as to say that had the refs called a fare game from the 5 minute mark of the second half, Kansas would definitely have lost. How did Kansas wear down Curry? BY HANGING ON HIM AND HACKING HIM NUMB! That's how he was worn down. The refs would not call a foul on Kansas despite the obvious hacking by the big men when Davidson went to the hoop. Nor did they blow a whistle when they hacked Curry like Chicken Chow Mein. I didn't care who won the game, but I didn't need to see the refs influence the outcome as badly as they did. Their non-calls against Kansas and their ticky-tac calls that went consistently against Davidson ruined what would have been a more exciting finish to the game. It probably would have resulted in a Davidson win or at the very least an overtime period to say the least. Sad for the Davidson folks as their kids didn't deserve that shoddy treatment by the refs. If you Tivoed the game, you'll have the evidence from the 5 minute mark on. Pathetic.

Worn down? Why, was Davidson the favorite or something? I think Davidson's continued ability to stay in it was amazing. Compare to Stanford against UT, or UT against Memphis, or Louisville against UNC, where towards the end, the losing team ran out of steam. Davidson NEVER ran out of steam. They never looked tired. They never looked nervous. They looked like they belonged in this game, and probably could have beaten Kansas on a different day, or UCLA for that matter.

Congrats to Davidson. You should be proud of what you did this weekend. Amazing stuff.