powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Bulls? Not these Chicagoan's. Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Bulls? Not these Chicagoan's.


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Bulls? Not these Chicagoan's.
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 23, 2007

April 9, 2008 2:01 pm
To bad there wasn't a international representation of Bulls.  The Living breathing creature that is, with a heart and that will stampede anything that gets in it's way.  In the history of sports, I can not remember a team who is as far from it's nickname as this Chicago Bulls squad(if you want to call them that, notice I didn't say team.)  So with this roster of overpaid crybabies, I'm voting for a name change. Who says there's no I in team?
 

Bulls? Not these Chicagoan's.
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 26, 2007

April 9, 2008 5:43 pm
I voted for Deadbeats but serouisly dude, quit it.... every single team is going to have a bad season once in a while. We can get to the top just like that next year. We really can, BUT that would mean sacrificing for the short term instead of the long term. Look at the Celtics 2 or the big 3 are over 30 years of age and will soon wind down and they have no good guys to replace them.... Now look at the Charlotte Bobcats(my second favorite team), they suck right now I know that, BUT I think in a year or two they'll be playoff contenders and will make it to the playoffs... they have a whole bunch of young players who devour the court and with a FA and a prospect with a guarunteed breakout season next year and a high draft pick then their franchise will be set. So the realy question is.... do we sacrifice another losing season or two in order to build up our team and have another dynasty in a few years OR build up our team for the next 3 seasons and try to win a championship?