powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Everything Is Political Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Everything Is Political


View Message Board ·  Return to StoryViews:      


Everything Is Political
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 29, 2006

April 11, 2008 10:09 am
The old saying  "everything is political, and all politics are local" still rings true. The modern day Olympics are purely political. This year's Olympics in China are eerily similar to the 1936 games in Berlin. In 1936 Adolf Hitler had been frantically building the Nazi war machine, and his work was nearly completed. Hitler masterfully used the '36 Olympics as a method of whipping up nationalism. Germany was preparing their "coming out" party, and was ready to start across Europe. There was plenty of political unrest at the time, and Europe was especially wary of the Germans. Hitler utilized the 1936 Olympics as a vehicle to show the world what Germany had. Everything was scripted and carefully controlled. It wasn't about the games, it was about advertising power. Hitler controlled everything but Jesse Owens. Everything about the upcoming games is similar to the 1936 Olympics. China's pace and scale at war machine building makes Hitler look like an amateur. Taiwan and Tibet are powder kegs that can be detonated at any moment. The Chinese governments attempts to control and micromanage ever last detail borders on insanity. Their determination to hide the true China, and present a falsified Utopia, is exactly like 1936. Make no mistake, these Olympics are 100% political, and China could care less about athletic competition. These games are about sabre rattling. China is preparing their own "coming out" party, and you can bet that after these Olympics are over, they will be itching to come out of their borders. Taiwan will be their first destination, and it will happen literally overnight. Of course, the U.S. will wag our fingers in shame, and condemn their actions. History repeats itself, over and over. Nobody ever seems to learn from it.

Everything Is Political
-
Reputation:80
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 25, 2006

April 11, 2008 12:35 pm
Excellent response to Doyel, who obviously can't think beyond bumper-sticker simplicities. And McCain has also called for a boycott of the opening ceremonies.  I guess that also makes him one of the "do-gooder elites"?

Anyway, throughout his column, Doyel disingenuously blurs the line between calls for an all-out boycott and calls for boycotting the opening ceremonies. While he mentions this distinction early in the column, he makes a vague reference to some Europeans "openly discussing" a boycott of the entire thing--which is also disingenuous, since such talk is hardly representative of most of Europe--and then quickly proceeds as if both versions of a boycott are the same. Almost all of the feedback on the various threads to Doyel's column suggests that his rhetorical strategy has worked. 

But a boycott of the opening ceremonies would deeply embarrass the Chinese government; the greater the number of countries who join in this symbolic protest, the deeper the embarrassment. Anyone who claims otherwise is admitting that he or she has not read much about this issue, particularly from the point of view of the Chinese government.