Goodell to punish Pats

Answer - DOES NOT MATTER.  Matt Walsh was an employee and an employer (the Pats) is always responsible for an employees actions, regardless if they had permission or not.

BackAndGold18,

Bend over and take a look.  It's probably there right next to your brain.  What?  You think the Commish answers to you?

There is NO RULE against video taping an opposing teams walkthrough.  Matt Walsh would be held responsible if the Patriots organization didnt give him direct orders to do it.

So therefor, that guy who is still holding onto his Ravens Super Bowl win years ago is 0-2 and needs to know what he is talking about before trying to put somebody else down.  BTW your team still sucks.

BlackAndGold18,

What position do you hold in the NFL?  Are you the Commish's secretary or something because apparently you now every rule every made.

If it wasn't against the rules then how come the commish said that if this is substantiated the Pats WILL be punished, not Walsh?

"Answer - DOES NOT MATTER.  Matt Walsh was an employee and an employer (the Pats) is always responsible for an employees actions, regardless if they had permission or not."

So if i go out today and rob a bank my employer should be held responsible? 

Using your logic, Arthur Blank should be sharing a jail cell with Michael Vick.

So if i go out today and rob a bank my employer should be held responsible? That's warping sound logic. It's not going to work in this case.  

"That's warping sound logic. It's not going to work in this case.  "

How is his logic sound?   His exact statement was that an employer is responsible for an employee's behavior, whether they knew about it or not. 

Using his logic, the Patriots are to be held accountable for Matt Walsh taping the Rams' walkthrough, even if they didn't authorize it, knew nothing about it and didn't use the tapes.  Does that sound fair to you?