powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?


View Message BoardViews:      


WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 25, 2007

April 28, 2008 3:03 pm
ask me again in three years.

WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 12, 2008

April 28, 2008 3:44 pm
Seahawks B
  The Hawks got what they needed, A replacement for Josh Brown some help on the D line and a tight end. 

WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 2, 2006

April 28, 2008 4:08 pm

Steelers:  A-

Just like every other Steeler fan out there, i was pretty shocked when they took Rashard Mendenhall in the first round. I thought it was a stupid pick, but after hearing Tomlin's theory on protecting quarterbacks, it makes sense. Mendenhall was a top 3 back we got at pick 23, and Limas Sweed was a top 5-6 receiver we got in the second round. Bruce Davis looks like he'll be a pretty good linebacker in his own right. Dennis Dixon could be a great backup once he gets established, or he could even be the next Slash. He clocked in only a second behind Sweed in the 40, so there's possibilities. I liked watching Laundry when i would watch W. Virginia games, and i think he'll contribute nicely on special teams. I don't know much about Tony Hill, the offensive tackle they picked up i think in the 4th round. I also don't know much about the other OLB the Steelers picked up (I can't remember his name). Either way, i'm getting pretty excited for this offense this upcoming season.


WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 16, 2006

April 28, 2008 4:39 pm
I will give the Steelers an A for the first day of the draft. Mendenhall and Sweed could very well limit the number of sacks Ben has to take because they will have to be accounted for so it will not be an all out powerhouse rush on every play. The second day I will give them a C+ only because I think they should have tried to do a little something more with the Oline and Dline for the future. I am not sold on Dennis Dixon but I have never seen him play so I don't know that much about him. I just thought they could have addressed some glaring needs from last year. So overall I would say they got a B draft grade.

WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jun 4, 2007

April 28, 2008 5:06 pm

Patriots filled our needs with 3 LB's and 2 CB's and hopefully got a our QB to start the post-Brady era. Hopefully he can be groomed into a nice replacement.

Mayo is solid and versatile and I expect Crable to play outside. Hopefully Ruud can have an impact like his brother did at Tampa.

Overall I would give us a B
We covered our needs and hopefully got our next generation of solid linebackers.


WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:May 14, 2007

April 28, 2008 5:24 pm
I'm somewhat neutral on the Packers draft. I didn't know that much about Jordy Nelson until he was drafted and he looks like he might be a good fit in our receiver corps. On top of that he may turn out to be a big time return man on special teams.

Having Brian Brohm drop to us at #56 was a possible blessing. We needed depth at the position and he was a good talent at the spot. Then getting Flynn on top of that gives us some real trade bait for the future.

I am not at all convinced about this CB Lee. Haven't seen any overwhelmingly great things written about him so we will have to wait and see. I thought we should have taken another DB just in case since that is one area that we need more quality depth.

We did get a couple of quality o-linemen that should at least push the incumbents to play better if not actually replacing them.

The TE Finley looks to be a 50/50 shot. Has some upside to him, but, it looks like he is just more of the same thing we already have.

Again I don't see much of anything coming from Thompson the DE. Some folks seem to think he will be better at OLB. We'll see.

With another receiver thrown into the mix for good measure I would have to give the Packers draft  a  C+.

WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 5, 2007

April 28, 2008 6:23 pm

On day 1 it looked as if the Lions were doing bad, but after the draft was over I realized that they had a very solid draft, filling there needs and getting solid talent so the Lions get an A.

 


WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 4, 2008

April 28, 2008 6:32 pm

Bears failed.

We need a QB. Where is he?


WHAT IS YOUR TEAM'S DRAFT GRADE: A+? F?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 22, 2007

April 28, 2008 7:40 pm

Personally, I like what the Ravens and Steelers did.  They are probably my top two.  The Chiefs addressed a lot of needs, but I'm not as crazy about their draft as so many of the "experts" are.

As far as the Bears failing, they addressed their biggest needs.  In theory, they upgraded the offensive line, brought in serious competion for Benson (who I am ready to call a bust as a featured back), and addressed the need for depth on a defense that was plagued by injuries last year.  As far as QBs go, both Grossman and Orton have both shown that they can control a game or even be good when given enough time (remember when there was talk about Rex being MVP after an outstanding September in 2006?).  The Bears hopefully took care or the most glaring problems.  Even Peyton Manning or Tom Brady would look like hell behind last year's line.  By the time the Bears addressed their biggest needs (OT and RB) any QB that could come in and really make an immediate difference was pretty much gone.  They also needed to draft a good receiver for that QB to throw to.  Why waste big money on a guy that probably won't be the ultimate answer (certianly not for a few years)?  Besides, they grabbed two rookie free agent QBs (along with 8 other rookie free agents).  Overall, I would give the Bears somewhere in the C+ to B- range.