powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Drafting WR's Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Drafting WR's


View Message Board ·  Return to StoryViews:      


Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 4, 2007

May 3, 2008 11:24 am
Although this years draft stock of wide outs didnt have the strength that recent years have had, i think part of the reason none were taken in the first round had to do with the impact a rookie receiver makes... which, is very little. Look at the impact CJ had last year, its just not the same as drafting a player at a position that can start right after being drafted for 10 solid years. Then you look at a receiver that a team can pick up in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th round and on, they are really similar, route running is probably the one thing that can make a receiver stick out, but teams are rethinking drafting these guys so high. Especially when you could get lucky in a late round with a guy like Colston.


Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 20, 2008

May 3, 2008 11:33 am

Considering the Redskins didnt have a receiver catch a touchdown untill week 8 or 9 last year I think Thomas could have an immediate impact.  Having Santana Moss and Chris Cooley is going to help a lot


Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 21, 2006

May 3, 2008 1:28 pm
Colston and Boldin made immediate impact with there respective teams. Wide receivers are starting to make a pretty big impression early on  now as opposed to the past. Devin Thomas falls in a great system with no pressure with Moss and Cooley being pro bowlers.

Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:64
Level:Pro
Since:Feb 24, 2008

May 3, 2008 9:31 pm

I agree.  Every draft you can find wide receivers that eventually make the Pro Bowl being drafted in the later rounds.  However the Tom Brady's are few and far between.  Most Pro Bowl QB's are found in the first few rounds.  GM's are getting smarter and waiting to take WR's and RB's because your can find talent deep in the draft at those positions.


Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 24, 2007

May 4, 2008 12:44 pm
Good points, redsfan.  Some WRs are successful immediately: Boldin, Fitzgerald, Dwane Bowe last year for the Chiefs.  The difference, though, is that late round picks can be good players, too.  There are some positions where you have to be a top round draft pick to be good.  You mention quarterback as a position like that.  Most good quarterbacks are indeed high picks, with Brady and Bulger being some of the more notable exceptions.  There is one position without exceptions: LT.  There have been NO probowl tackles since at least 2000 (I have no idea the last time it ever happened) who were not 1st or 2nd round picks.  In fact, there are at most 5 LTs who were not first day picks.  And how important is this position?  It can make later-round quarterbacks much better.  Look at Bulger and Kurt Warner (back in the day) with Orlando Pace, Trent Green with Willie Roaf, Derek Andersen with Joe Thomas.  More importantly, look what happened to Green and Bulger when their tackles got injured: they sucked. 

WRs are not being drafted high because there are some holes that can only be filled in the first two rounds.  You can find a good receiver in any round.  Boldin was a 2, Steve Smith was a 3, Colston and Donald Driver were 7s.  Until some more ridiculously amazing WRs come in an completely outclass the other WRs (like Randy Moss), then the upside to drafting WRs high will be too low...unless you're Detroit.

Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:May 4, 2008

May 4, 2008 2:50 pm
Your right on with that the 1st round wideouts seem to have trouble unless your Randy Moss if i was a gm i would never draft a player that touches the ball 4-5 times a game in the 1st round.

Drafting WR's
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 22, 2006

May 5, 2008 1:04 pm
I strongly disagree Buffs06.  Wide receivers usually take 3-4 years before they really impact the game.  Now, there are exceptions to the norm as a Colston, but even he as great as he was, could not finish his rookie season due to injury.  Also, you mention Boldin and Colston as examples, but neither of those players were 1st round picks which I think was the original posters point.  Boldin was the 54th player taken and even the 6th receiver off the board.  Colston was drafted in the 7th round at 252.  The point is that you can find talent at the wide receiver position late in drafts and that most receivers taken early almost never live up to their hype or guady drafting position.  For every 1st or 2nd round success, I can show you 5 busts.  Remember Peter Warwick, Desmond Howard, Michael Westbrook, Mike Williams and Charles Rodgers...All overhyped first round busts!  Just like in fantasy...you can find qualtiy at that position late.