powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Riddle me this one. Completely OT!  Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Riddle me this one. Completely OT!


View Message BoardViews:      


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 4, 2007

May 7, 2008 4:43 pm

Also, it is questionable that IF a person accepts the "challenge" of the original "you" and intimately becomes the person on the show, that at that point, is he/she privy to the remainder of the info you provide, including what the host knows. IOW, is the info about what the host knows for the benefit of the nonparticipating reader or the person who becomes the "you" on the show.

LOL


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 8, 2006

May 7, 2008 4:55 pm

If you know the game show host knows, you switch, but if you don't know if he knows.  It doesn't matter...So it doesn't matter if the host knows, it matters if the guesser knows the host knows.

Wrong again.  It only matters if the host knows.  As long as the host knows, it is in the guesser's best interest to switch (whether the guesser knows the host knows doesn't change the probability). 

So if you MEANT the definite "you" rather than the indefinite "you", you didn't explain that well enough. 

Regardless of which "you" it is the answer doesn't change.  YOU (the guy typing on the keyboard) are the one deciding if it is better for YOU (the guy staring at Bob Barker's Babes) to switch. 


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 4, 2007

May 7, 2008 5:08 pm
That's your opinion, Smokey. Problem is ... as the writer of the problem, you cannot assume how the reader will interpret your words. As a previous poster wrote, apparently from a statistical standpoint, it is critical to the problem whether the game show participant KNOWs whether the host knows. And from the words you used in your original post, you leave it up to the reader to interpret what you meant. If the point was not critical to solving the problem, your loose language wouldn't be an issue. Since apparently the point is critical to the problem, your loose language IS the issue ...

Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 12, 2008

May 7, 2008 5:11 pm
ok here's the difference:

Smokey is on a game show and there are three doors, one of which there is a car behind. Smokey doesn't know which one, and doesn't know if the host knows. the host reveals there is nothing behind door two. if the host doesn't know, smokeys probability of winning the car is 1/2, if the host does, its 2/3. its smarter for smokey to switch based on this, but that doesn't guarantee the probability is 2/3.

i know the host knows, but it was unclear in the question whether or not smokey knew if the host knew.


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 12, 2008

May 7, 2008 5:13 pm
Can anyone figure this one out?

A warden meets with 23 prisoners. He tells them the following:

- Each prisoner will be placed into a room numbered 1-23. Each will be alone in the room, which will be soundproof, lightproof, etc. In other words, they will NOT be able to communicate with each other.

- They will be allowed one planning session before they are taken to their rooms.

- There is a special room, room 0. In this room are 2 switches, which can each be either UP or DOWN. They cannot be left in between, they are not linked in any way (so there are 4 possible states), and they are numbered 1 and 2. Their current positions are unknown.

- One at a time, a prisoner will be brought into room 0. The prisoner MUST change one and only one switch. The prisoner is then returned to his cell.

- At any time t, given some N> 0, there exists a finite t_0 by which time every prisoner will have visited room 0 at least N times. (in other words, there is no fixed pattern to the order or frequency with which prisoners visit room 0, but at any given time, every prisoner is guaranteed to visit room 0 again). (If you're still confused by this statement, ignore it, and you should be ok).

- At any time, any prisoner may declare that all 23 of them have been in room 0. If right, the prisoners go free. If wrong, they are all executed.

What initial strategy is 100% guaranteed to let all go free?


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 8, 2006

May 7, 2008 5:32 pm

As a previous poster wrote, apparently from a statistical standpoint, it is critical to the problem whether the game show participant knows whether the host knows.

Again, whether the participant knows the host knows doesn't matter at all for the sake of answering the riddle.  You (the person reading the riddle) know the host knows, so you are supplied with all the information you need to determine which decision is to the advantage of the game show participant.


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 12, 2008

May 7, 2008 5:45 pm
yes the reader knows, but it was unclear as to whether or not this problem was to be evaluated from the perspective of the participant (which would be logical) or not.

lets move on and keep having some riddle fun. theres still an unsolved riddle on the board.


Riddle me this one. Completely OT!
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 4, 2007