I dispute that Rock_Strongo made himself look like a complete clown by posting the definition of cheating.
He looks like a complete clown for not understanding the definition of the word cheating, even when reading it.
Here is what he put:
(intransitive) To violate rules in order to gain advantage from a situation.
An all world future Hall of Fame and very nearly the greastest RB in the history of the position, say like LT gains an advantage by stiff arming a defender attempting to tackle him.
That is not at all within the definition of cheating.
There is no violation of rules, so he gained an advantage without cheating.
The Patriots violated the rules by taping coaches signals, nothing at all to do with where the camera was placed, if you listen to Roger Goodall's statement after interviewing Matt Walsh.
They used them to gain an unfair advantage that does fall within the definition of cheating.
He is just grasping at the last excuse he has.
And doing just as poor a job of it.
Why? Because that may just be a made up definition in the first place. Every dictionary reads more like this:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cheat
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cheat
What he is doing seems much more like this:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liar
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liar
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lie
But didn't we already know these things? I mean it takes one to root for one....right?
