powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
A Republican explanation thread Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

A Republican explanation thread


View Message BoardViews:      


A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 3, 2006

May 5, 2008 11:55 pm

That's two crackpots for McCain & one for Obama.

so Obama has 1 crackpot and one unrepentant terrorist. 

 

I think I'll go with the guy that has a very loose tie with a crackpot instead.


A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:49
Level:Rookie
Since:Sep 22, 2006

May 6, 2008 10:29 am
 

The difference is, Bush didnt lie.  He acted on bad intelligence.

 

 

Yes he did,,,,,,,,  HIS !!!!

----------------

why b/c democrats told you he did...you are such a puppet who ha no ability to think on his/her own....typical democrat though!! Bush acted on bad intelligence. Look up th edeifnition of a lie, if you know how to use a dictionary b/cdemocrats are usually very unintelligent


A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:91
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 1, 2007

May 6, 2008 12:13 pm
twodawgs

Here is a third nutjob endorsing McCain.  Jerry Falwell, and his casual association of 9/11 and Katrina with the sins of homosexuality.  Give me  a break.  This is just as stupid as anything Wright has said.  Yet McCain has not repudiated any of these three men.  At least Obama has the balls to at lest do that.

A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 24, 2006

May 6, 2008 4:25 pm

so Obama has 1 crackpot and one unrepentant terrorist. 

 

I think I'll go with the guy that has a very loose tie with a crackpot instead.

Go ahead & vote for him, but I don't think Nadar can win
This is why it's going to cost the GOP this year.  You can't even requote honestly what I said.  Typical Neo-Con comeback that isn't truthful. 

A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2006

May 7, 2008 6:14 am

Jerry Falwell, and his casual association of 9/11 and Katrina with the sins of homosexuality.  Give me  a break.  This is just as stupid as anything Wright has said.  Yet McCain has not repudiated any of these three men

 

    John McCain has repudiated Pastor Hagee's statements and made statements to that effect on February 29th, March 8th and March 11th.  He has made it clear time and again that he does not support those views, whether they come from Pastor Hagee, Rod Parsley, or Jerry Falwell. 

John McCain has not attended Falwell's, Hagee's or Parsley's church faithfully for the last 20 years.  Doing so would indicate at least a tacit approval of their messages.  Obama's long time association and financial support of the Rev. Wright suggests a level of agreement and support that goes far beyond tacit approval.  In such a circumstance Obama must vociferously repudiate the Rev. Wright and his views in order for us to believe that he does not endorse such racist pap.  I, for one, find that hard to believe.  TheDemocrat voters seem ready to believe him or at least not care that he might share such divisive views. 


A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 3, 2006

May 7, 2008 10:47 am
I ahve also seen a few people say that the new Rev there is just as bad as Wright and Obama still hasnt left the church.  If I make it back to Chicago before the election I will try to get into the church one sunday and see if its real.

A Republican explanation thread
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 24, 2006

May 7, 2008 11:31 am
But has McCain disowned the support of these two pastors?  What I find somewhat ironic is that Obama has to pretty much sell his soul to repudiate his pastor.  And even that is not enough.  How many times over the last 20 years do you really think Obama has been in "his" church attending worship.  Like McCain, he's a politician first.  So, the real question is when do you stopp jobbing Obama on his pastor & start dealing with real issues of the campaign?

A Republican explanation thread
-