powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Packer fan (No Bashing) Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Packer fan (No Bashing)


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jun 8, 2007

May 13, 2008 10:14 pm
My bad, the stats are actually on this thread, top of page 4.

Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 4, 2007

May 14, 2008 5:05 am
Come on you stupid Packers fans, don't you understand?  No Favre + Jarred Allen, Bernard Berrian, Jarred Allen, AP, Jarred Allen = Super Bowl, Come on!


Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 13, 2008

May 15, 2008 5:10 am

HAHAHAH are u serious hrdrv2--- 

Jackson Sucks and i know im gonna get alot of sh** for saying so -- yes Rodgers hasnt played much yet so hes unproven but what has Jackson done? you can throw all the stats out you want about Jackson Vikqeen fans ..but he still has 0 playoff appearance and has more Interceptions  than TD's ( referring to his career stats ) and has a 69.0 QB rating ( not impressive enough to say hes gonna lead the Vikqueens to the SB ). 

As far as the other fans saying we dont have an impressive Offensive Line and say that minnesota's line is better read the link hes ranking the top O - Lines in the NFC in 2007 ( a line that if healty is virtually the same with the additions of players via the NFL draft )  ....

http://www.nfl.com/fantasy/story;jsessionid=42761A6A8138699672F082391AA2C5A2?id=09000d5d8063fec4&template=with-video&confirm=true

and finally Bernard Berrian i cant belive you viking fans can even compare him to any WR  we have on our roster..u wanna compare his career stats as well as last year ....

Berrian - Career Stats : 150 rec  2,197 yds 13 TDS  ( 14.6 AV )

2007 stats  - 951 YDS  -- 5 TD's   13.4 av.

 

Driver - Career Stats :  503 rec   6,977 yds  38 td's  ( 13.9 av )

2007 stats-  82 rec  1,048 2 td  ( 12.8 av )

Jennings  - Career : 98 rec 1,552 yds 15 td's  ( 15.8 rating )

2007 sats - 53 rec   920 yds 12 td's  (  17.4 av  ) **** and that was only playing in 13 games  ( he missed the first two weeks with an injury )

Clearly any of the Packers WR would burn Minnesota's recievers out of the water.....you all act as if Berrian is the secont comming of your offense..he's only one of two  average player on your offense ( and im not talking about peterson ) .... Peterson will get many carries because the Vikings have nothing  on offense besides a great RB ( yes AP is an amazing back ) a mediocre QB and an average WR ( that The Bears didnt even want )

GB has the edge in Offense ---and as far as Defense...Im not convinced adding one player will suddenly change the Vikings defense ..they still needed to cover recievers ( and they didnt do that too well against GB last Year ) ...

 

 


Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 1, 2008

May 15, 2008 10:56 am

Respect, you can talk all the smack you want about Jackson, but Rodgers is a lot worse! He is more injury prone and he hasn't started a game yet. T-Jack was 8-4 as a starter last year. You had better pray Rodgers can suck that bad. T-Jack would have had a better record if he had receivers that could have held on to the ball. The Vikings receiver corp is not great, but they will be better this year than last year and all we need is a little bit of improvement in our passing game to have an improvement in our record. Our defense will be much improved with an actual pass rush and improved coverage. The Vikings management actually addressed some of our teams needs in the off season. What did GB do? Lost a HOF QB and nothing else. I can't wait for the Monday night game to see the beat down the Vikes put on the Pack.

BTL


Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 22, 2007

May 15, 2008 12:27 pm
O I know they are just ignorant. i try to see everyone point on things but alot of the time they are just flat out wrong..like the guy who started this post................... i went on a packer board and before and after this post he has been talking chit so on one of them i called him a "damn lyin fool" ... i hate people like that.

Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 26, 2006

May 15, 2008 5:28 pm

As far as the other fans saying we dont have an impressive Offensive Line and say that minnesota's line is better read the link hes ranking the top O - Lines in the NFC in 2007 ( a line that if healty is virtually the same with the additions of players via the NFL draft )  ....

http://www.nfl.com/fantasy/story;jsessionid=42761A6A8138699672F082391AA2C5A2?id=09000d5d8063fec4&template=with-video&confirm=true

You are kidding right!  This is an article written by a fantasy football writer, and a terrible one at that.  And his ranking system is based on a baseball type rottisserie scoring system, that has been modified to rank the NFL o-lines.  If you want to believe that the Packers have a better o-line than the Vikings based on this clowns work, go for it!  I'm sure it makes you feel better, and sleep better at night!

Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 26, 2006

May 15, 2008 5:51 pm
Clearly any of the Packers WR would burn Minnesota's recievers out of the water.....

Donald Driver is the only clear advantage the Packers WR group has over the Vikings WR's.  And he is getting older.  The rest of the Packers WR's ARE NOT CLEARLY better;

2007-2008:

Bernard Berrian  122-1726-11    Greg Jennings   98-1552-15

2008:

Bobby Wade  54-647-3     James Jones  47-676-2

Sidney Rice  31-395-4     Ruvell Martin  16-242-4

Andre Allison  8-122-0     Jordy Nelson  0-0-0

Like I said, Driver is a stud, but beyond him I certianly don't see this clear advantage the Packers have.

 


Packer fan (No Bashing)
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 13, 2008

May 15, 2008 6:52 pm

BIGHAWK.... The Vikings offensive line gave up a total of 38 sacks --- Green Bay only 19 ---- although your team was better in Rushing Minnesota also wasnt mixing around there offensive Lineman  due to injuries ( Which included Clifton and Tauscher )    ... if gb is healty we can have one of the best offensive lines in the league...... and They have other recievers besides Driver...Jennings could have a breakout season and they drafted another WR Jordy Nelson ( and i didnt even mention James Jones ) ....... The Vikings Passing Offense ( like i exsplained to BTLSFAN ) was terrible in 07 and adding Berriman an average WR who hasnt proved hes a #1 reciever  ( which is why chicago got rid of him - )

Driver , Jennings and Jones - Combined 2,644 yards and 19 td...

Berrian, Rice and Wade - 1,994 Yards 12 tds...

 

BTLSFAN -- Jackson hasnt dont sh** and are u kidding me...injured proned..look at TJACK He only Played in 12 games last year ...12... he didnt play due to an injury ( he hurt his knee ) --- he was benched his rookie season ..then in 2007 he threw costly interceptions which caused Minnesota to have the secont worst passing offense in the League. -- as far as rodgers injuries..his first injury was a stupid fluke accident vs New England...after that he hasnt been injured so how the hell is he injured proned ?  And as far as addressing there needs --ITS CALLED THE NFL DRAFT....the Packers drafted several needs included TE, CB , And WR...mabey you should've actaully watched it and payed attention.... getting one Average WR ( that even chicago didnt want ) and a Defensive player doenst make up for the Lack of Offense your team DOESN'T HAVE  ( with the exception of Peterson who's there only threat )

I cant wait untill MNF Too when  GB pounds Minnesota