| |
|
|
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 10, 2007
|
|
This is a good list but I thought these two teams would be on it. Kansas City is awful at QB and in Cleveland there is a QB problem that would be a fantasy for any team.
|
|
|
Reputation:60
Level:Pro
Since:Apr 15, 2008
|
|
are you stupid kc a qb problem for sure did you watch cleveland last year they didnt have a problem.
|
|
|
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 19, 2006
|
|
Cleveland doesn't have much of a QB problem. They have a great situation brewing over there with Derek Anderson exploding last year. Now Brady Quinn has time to ease into his future franchise role. If Anderson plays like he did last year they are definitely going to love it. Having two good quarterbacks battling for the job is always a plus. The 5 mentioned teams are places where the QBs are either so bad, shaky, or unproven that they really don't know who they trust to give the job to.
|
|
|
Reputation:74
Level:Pro
Since:Feb 3, 2007
|
|
These are teams with no Qb's not 2 that could start on any of the 6 others. Please stop taling about the Browns in the future
|
|
|
Reputation:75
Level:Pro
Since:Mar 2, 2007
|
also, the qb situation in KC is bad but it's almost a given that B. Croyle will get the job this year...and they'll just have to evaluate him behind (hopefully) a line that will protect the passer better and do a better job at run blocking.
As for Cleveland, they have a great situation although Brady is not proven, as mentioned above, he could probably start for all the clubs mentioned in this article + KC ....
|
|
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 22, 2006
|
|
The whole KC offense was terrible last year but they took several steps in the draft to better themselves.
But the funny thing about their drafts look back at haow many WR's they've drafted the last 5 years. Alot, & few have panned out for them.
Cleveland however, Derek Anderson has walked into a trap. If he plays like the first half of last year all will be fine. If not look for Quinn to take over & Anderson may find himself on one of the teams above.
|
|
|
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 16, 2007
|
|
Like everyone is saying Cleveland is not even in a bad situation at qb. But how about these teams. Vikings, Redskins, Falcons, and Texans i mean lets be honest the qbs for these teams could use major improvements.
|
|
|
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 27, 2007
|
|
Browns better not have a QB problem since they just dropped major green on their passing game. They signed Donte Stallworth to a huge contract. Gave Anderson a big contract. If they don't produce, somebody's gonna be right back on the hot seat they were on before last season...thatd be you, Romeo Crennel.
|
|
|
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 27, 2007
|
|
Come on man, listen to the team your avatar represents. Jim Zorn, Vinny Cerato, and all the other coaches have already made it clear, Jason Campbell is the QB. Collins is 37 years old, he could certainly be an effective QB, but at 37, its not a good gameplan to stunt Jason Campbell's growth as a QB and sit him while Todd Collins quickly becomes the next Mark Brunell...meaning come in for a season, do an okay job and then fade into retirement.
Despite what anyone might say, Campbell has played well so far. Remember he only has a little more than one season under his belt as the starter and his completion percentage was at 60% last year, he's throw more TDs than INTs(22 tds, 17 ints) and his arm is every bit as strong as we all heard it was when he came out of Auburn. Thats more than almost any young QB can say having played only 20 games so far in the NFL. He'll be in the same offensive system this year as he was his final year at Auburn when he was a Heisman candidate in the best conference in college football. Zorn is working directly with Campbell and everything coming out of the OTAs so far has been very positive.
Campbell> Collins
|
|
|
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 6, 2008
|
|
ShawneManning............sir...you are an idiot, and you should NEVER be allowed to start another thread in your life!..........Cleveland?.......Anderson????.......Kansas City???......Croyle?......
first of all, Anderson is probably gonna make the Pro Bowl this year, and as far as Croyle goes, he started 7! games last year, so NOBODY knows what he will do, let alone YOU!
since Croyle had better numbers than Jamarcus "FAT BOY " R ussell had last year, maybe you should have gone after the Faida's, instead of the Chiefs!
AND might i add, that since the Chiefs had arguably the WORST offensive line in the game last year, HOW could you attack the QB position of the Chiefs, instead of the O-line?.......hmmm?....and while i am at it, since the Vikings had the BEST O-line in the bidniz last year, why, in your infinite wisdom, did u not go after the WORST starting QB in the NFL , T. Jackson?.......
dude, i can appreciate the question, but you should NOT start a thread until you have researched the FACTS!
jus sayin'...
iho......
|
|
