To Gints boii, Toothless Tikis, Kwickwhipped,

Luk,

  Stop trying to reason with brokeback, a real man can admit when he's bean beaten and get over it.  All this boy does is throw out insignificant stats and downplay certain achievements. 

And brokeback, don't think I hate you....it's more like I nothing you.  Your just a corny little cry baby who loves to live in the past.  You told no one, your point has not been made, and you my friend are nothing more then a whinny cbs poster who's got nothing left on his plate and can't stand it. 

Sincerely,

Ginstboii

NY Giants

Super Bowl Champs

Baaaaaaaalllllliiiiiiinnnnnn!

Damn brokeback...he styled on you son

NY Giants Superbowl 42 Champions 2008, not 2005, 1996 or any other irrelavent year

In Chronological order:

Gayboii;

You have yet to answer why your boyfriend was dumb enough to challange me to come on your board,...........on the thread of which I started on your board,...........Second I think the point was made that you have to fight for him,.......then again, it's a natural reaction for the boyfriend to jump in and save is girl so I guess that's why you keep annoying me saying nothing and meaning even less to me when you do post.

To the rest of you before I get to Princecrossdresserbornin1981 I think I said if you could challange the fact that the Giants were not the better team or dominate through the whole game (specifically the second half in which you couldn't come close to scoring again),  to goto the play-by-play and then bring back those portions that dispute my claim.....................I also see none but one (imripped) has been man enough to admit that fact.

To Prince ImmapunkfartedoutacowzA$$in1981(or prinzNJ if you prefer);

,...................................oh,........I'm sorry I wasn't paying attention to you,...........I nodded off somewhere between your first response and this last one,.............must be the "Best of Tupac" CD I keep hearin' everytime your avatar shows up.

By the way spittin' East Coast tramp talk, and putting up a Tupac avatar is about the standard for an idiot born in 1981 since Tupac hated anything East Coast "Saaan".

And finally to Imripped;

Lets get something straight about who's really talkin' crap.  Tikis, KwaDeezy, you and Gayboii where the ones talking crap first,.....Tikis came on our board, talked crap and then when we chased him away he ran back to you starting a thread to help him after my comrades chased him off,............go look at the "TO ALL THE HATERS" thread if you think you can dispute that,  then tell Tikis to keep his trap shut next time.

If he can't fight his own battles tell him stay off our board and I won't have to hunt him down on your board. 

Tikis kept saying Barber ran out of gas,.............Barber rushed for 129 yards, Jacobs rushed for 67,..............how dumb is that statement?  Only a moron who just wants to talk crap would make a dumb statement like that knowing that the facts say otherwise.

The two (supposed) phantom holding calls:  in that game Uhm Dallas had 10 penalties for 84 yards, NY had 8 for 70 yards, so what are you talking about.  You still should have won that game if your argument is now about penalties, because we had more of them for more yards lost.  Make up your mind which excuse you're going to use to fit your argument or leave it alone.

You also had more first downs than dallas did which indicates again that you should have won that game, but apparently you were not the better team,...............so what happened there?

Excuses are just answers people use when they can't prove their point, facts are what you bring to the table.  The facts show that the game would likely have been much different without the un-earned fifteen yards and only eleven seconds left in the first half.

An excuse is saying phatom calls cost you the game even though Dallas had more penalties and penalty yards.

“An excuse is saying phatom calls cost you the game even though Dallas had more penalties and penalty yards.”

Isn’t this what you are essentially saying about the playoff game? Dallas lost because of a legit penalty that cost you the game. That sounds like an excuse.

"You also had more first downs than dallas did which indicates again that you should have won that game, but apparently you were not the better team,...............so what happened there?"

Funny, this is the exact opposite of the playoff game. Dallas “outplayed” the Giants with more yards and first downs, yet they lost the game. So by this reasoning above, Dallas was not the better team.

"If they flat out,.........out played Dallas, like the Eagles did, like the Redskins did or like the Patriots,.........that's one thing."

By this definition, the only losses that count against Dallas are when they are completely dominated? There are games every week in the NFL that are decided by one play or situation which changes the momentum of the game or decides the outcome. That neither team was able to dominate the other. That doesn’t mean the team who won doesn’t deserve the victory.

The last game of the season where the Giants lost to the Patriots was a game dominated by the Giants for most of 3 periods, and then the momentum changed and the Patriots scored several times to win the game. Do they not deserve the victory because the Giants were not totally dominated?

I understand it is a bitter pill to swallow that the Cowboys were not victorious. When the Giants lost to San Fran in the playoffs several years ago after dominating for over a half and then letting the 49ers get back into the game, and then to be denied a penalty (a flagrant one) for holding during the last second FG attempt to tie the game, I was upset. But put it in perspective. I have come to terms with this loss. The Giants should never have been in a position to lose because of a non-call at the waning moments of the game. They were not good enough or deserving enough to have won. If the Cowboys had been good enough, they would have won the game and a stupid penalty wouldn’t or shouldn’t have affected the outcome.

Finally, our offense was not dominating in the second half. It was our defense which kept us in the game against a very good high powered high scoring offense. I’ll give credit to the Cowboys that they played the Giants tough on defense, better than both regular season games. The Giants also played tough. Offensively, the Giants were very predictable, especially the last few series. But teams cannot always win by offense. Sometimes it’s defense that wins it and in the rare instance, special teams. A win is a win. Let the game go. When Dallas is good enough, it won’t matter about a stupid penalty, they will win the game anyway. That’s what Champions do.

brokeback,

You talk about being lucky.....then see your guys' game against the Bills....

Also I'll reiterate what was said earlier....

we made T.O. cry

Intercepted Brett Favres last pass

Plax predicted a win and Brady said" we're only going to score 17?"....and then only scored 14

To me, it does not get any better then that....and I PROMISE, you guys will never win a super bowl by beating an UNDEFEATED TEAM....even if you guys did beat us, you would have got slapped around in Green Bay, Romo could not have stood the cold....so sit back and enjoy your NFC east title, we'll sit back and relax with our Super Bowl Championship

and shut the F up with that play-by-play crap, like anyone feels like typing up a whole game on CBS you loser.....go home little boy, go home